Reductions in fertilizer emissions could be achieved through updated data collection models


Content of the article

Fertilizer emission reduction levels could be addressed by data correction.

Advertisement 2

Content of the article

Joy Agnew, associate vice president of applied research at Olds College, said farmers may not have to reduce their fertilizer use by 30% by 2030 to meet federal climate goals. According to her, current models of data collection do not properly account for use practices and carbon absorption and will be a major focus of research in the future.

Content of the article

“We’re going to adjust and update that factor and we could actually achieve that 30% emissions reduction just depending on how the emissions are calculated, potentially,” Agnew said. ” It’s my opinion. It’s kind of my math at the bottom of the envelope, but it’s possible it could play out that way.

Content of the article

She said that’s not a guarantee and adoption of practices is likely still needed. She noted that there has been considerable research into these practices over the past 30 years and that they are already widely used across the Prairies and that progress will continue to be made.

Advertisement 3

Content of the article

The climate plan only gives credit to agricultural soils for offsetting 4 MT or 6% of agricultural emissions.

Alberta Beef Producers President Melanie Wowk noted in July that they receive no credit for carbon capture and storage through pasture and grassland management. It is believed that this practice could be a major greenhouse gas sequestration and storage tool and studies are currently underway to map and quantify it.

Stephen Vandervalk, the Alberta vice-president of Western Canadian Wheat Growers, doesn’t know what else to do to reduce fertilizer emissions on his Fort MacLeod farm.

He has poured millions of dollars into maximizing the efficiency of fertilizers and other inputs while using the best sustainable farm management practices.

Advertisement 4

Content of the article

These best practices include the 4R nutrient stewardship program (right fertilizer, right rate, right time and right place), minimum tillage, proper rotations, and equipment that prevents overlap and waste.

He said most prairie farmers are already doing these things.

Meeting the federal government’s target would mean reducing its fertilizer input by 30%, which would have exponential negative effects on its crops. He increased the impact of fertilizers on crops sevenfold, “without this fertilizer, you don’t grow crops.”

“Farms are already net negative, not neutral but net negative, we are already taking in more carbon than we use to grow our crops. So none of that makes sense to me,” Vandervalk said. “It’s just a government that has no concept of agriculture, no concept of rural Canada and they have a mission at all costs and they just choose.

Advertisement 5

Content of the article

The WCWG sounded the alarm over Ottawa’s climate plan targets in late July, citing an analysis by Meyers Norris Penny that showed a loss of $9.14 billion for Prairie producers, including 2, $95 billion in Alberta if producers reduced their use of fertilizers as they have in some European countries.

Tom Steve, general manager of the Alberta Wheat and Barley Board, said Ottawa hasn’t committed enough to the initiative.

It took provincial agriculture ministers to raise the issue following meetings with the federal government to raise public awareness of the issue and the WCWG jumped on it.

While Ottawa has since announced it will extend consultations until the end of August, Steve said he was unable to get a clear response from the federal government.

Advertising 6

Content of the article

“I don’t think the government knows what it wants, it’s really a comedy of errors,” he said. “They were never able to provide the data to back up their claim that we need to move in this direction because western Canadian farmers have managed their inputs and reduced their carbon footprint, reducing gas emissions to greenhouse effect through tools such as minimum tillage for the past 30 years and have never been properly credited for it.

Marie-Claude Bibeau, Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, said there was a lot of misinformation circulating about the agricultural objectives of the Climate Plan.

The plan says agriculture is responsible for 73 MT of greenhouse gases in 2019, which is about 10% of Canada’s total emissions. It further indicates that Alberta (21%) and Saskatchewan (18.4%) account for nearly 40% of Canada’s agricultural emissions. Manitoba added an additional 7.6%. The Prairie provinces also account for the vast majority of agricultural activity in Canada, a role that has become more important with growing global food shortages.

Advertising 7

Content of the article

Agnew said it’s important to note that the 30% discount doesn’t apply equally across all areas. While Alberta and Saskatchewan account for a higher share of emissions, producers in other provinces have higher emission intensity, such as Ontario or Quebec.

Bibeau said the target is just a goal and there are currently no plans to enforce it through taxation or other mechanisms.

“Of course, the goal is ambitious, but there is nothing mandatory,” she said. “The idea is really to bring together as many people as possible to research better practices, better technologies, and I’m pretty sure there are things that we don’t already know that we will find out in the months and years to come. This will help us achieve the goals.

She pointed to the 4Rs program and said the data she has indicates that it represents only 25% of agricultural acres.

In support of this goal, the member for Compton-Stanstead — a rural municipality outside of Sherbrooke, Quebec. — said that the federal government is investing $1.4 billion in various projects, equipment and research. This includes commitments to expanding smart farms and living labs, which will help accelerate the transformation of science into practical applications.

Twitter: @JoshAldrich03

Advertisement 1


Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively yet civil discussion forum and encourages all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments can take up to an hour to be moderated before appearing on the site. We ask that you keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications. You will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, if there is an update to a comment thread you follow, or if a user follows you comments. See our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.


Comments are closed.